Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Thoughts on Rejection



The Cat Eater was rejected. Let’s face it: rejection is the writer's bane, and it's been so since the first caveman (caveperson?) made the first mark on a cavern wall.

"My work, the product of my rich and fertile imagination, was rejected by those ignorant fools, those illiterate slobs who have trouble reading hot dog stand menus, those Philistines. I'll never subject my work to their insults again. I can hardly wait until I'm dead so I can finally become famous."

And so it goes, time after time, month after month, year after year, decade after decade, lifetime after lifetime. What insight can I bring to this ongoing and thoroughly depressing phenomenon? I doubt I'll be able to shed any light in the gloom. All I know is that every time they do it to me, I sink to the same depths as I ever did.

But these days, knowing that I'm a whole lot more experienced, and being far more confident in my writing than when I was just starting out, I at least don't feel like quitting the writing altogether. These days, I know my writing is strong and that I've got plenty to say about the state of things, people's psychology, situations I've seen or extrapolated from reality. They can hurt me, yes, but they can't stop me.

It’s true that I'd only submitted it to one magazine, but it was rejected. And that knocked the wind from my sails, which are merely tattered rags after all these years of buffeting anyway. My writing cohorts tell me to submit again. That’s what we’re all told, right? “Keep the blasted things in the mail. Your work will never see daylight if left in a desk drawer” (or a computer file these days). That’s true enough, but it drives me nuts.

Here’s what I did in the past. After years of courting magazine editors to get my photos and articles published, I got fed up enough to start my own magazine (Shooter's Rag - Nature Photo Magazine). I moved to the other side of the desk. I no longer had to convince an editor that I was his/her ally and sell, sell, sell. I could, and did, write whatever I wanted, and I had a slush pile of other writers who were suddenly trying to sell their work to me. The foo was on the other shoet. (BTW, I treated other writers as colleagues, not as adversaries.)

The world had changed by the time no one was interested in publishing my Ben Bones novels, and I was able to go to Smashwords, Amazon KDP and CreateSpace to do it myself. Sales aren’t great, but I’m not beholden to anyone, and I’m not begging editors for the opportunity to help them fill their publications.

So now I'm again thinking of self-publishing. Not only The Cat Eater, but a book of my short works. I have a title for the collection and need to develop a cover. Now I have to weigh the possibility of no sales on my own, or postponing self-publishing in the traditional hope of a cash sale to magazines that are cavalier about my precious output. What a dilemma! As I'm wont to say: a writer's life is fraught with danger.

Yeah, I know, I have a bad attitude. What can I say? I’m a child of the 60s.

4 comments:

  1. Darn editors! So put it together with some other articles and put it up as an anthology on Amazon. Somebody will read it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what I've decided to do. Why not? My time on this earth is getting shorter by the minute and I don't want to waste it waiting for editors to reject my work.

      Delete
  2. I hear you. I probably have 1,000 rejections on novels I've now self-published. Last year I sold about 50,000 books - or, as I think of it - connected with 50,000 readers. I'm also a child of the 60s and didn't we learn that if you can't get past the gatekeepers you tear down the fence?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good grief! I wish I knew how you sold that many. Nothing in my life works like that. But I'll keep plugging away. Like most other writers, I'm more interested in the productive work than the promotion. If I don't break through in my lifetime, I plan to haunt them all afterwards.

      Delete